Understanding Performance Management

Explain formal and informal performance management evaluation in the workplace

Performance Management – A mentor’s role is to guarantee that informal evaluations are conducted regularly in the course of their work relationship and that their employees’ progress can be tracked in real-time. This form of evaluation can be accomplished through job-related conversations, a casual get-together over coffee, or an on-site inspection of a particular piece of work. Employees can benefit from less formal assessments by gaining as much information as possible without causing delays or mistakes.

This increases their chances of changing their behaviour (Aboalshamat et al., 2020). It is possible to avoid such surprises since informal feeds to employees are noted in the official assessment. Formal assessments should never take the place of informal ones, even if the latter is more convenient.

As part of a worker’s yearly performance assessment, this is commonly used for more official discussions between a manager and an employee. Maintaining a fresh annual evaluation is a priority for me as a line manager. This form of evaluation focuses on the employee’s accomplishments as well as their efforts to correct any flaws they may have.

In performance management, explain the job of the first-line manager

It is the first-line manager’s responsibility to make sure that his team accomplishes its goals. A first-line manager is responsible for providing consistent direction to the members of his staff to ensure that his team performs properly and that its members comprehend both their individual and collective goals, as well as how they contribute to the advancement of the business.

When they see their employees succeed, they may promote their feedback and help guide their development (Phillips et al., 2016). As a new employee, you may support them by saying “up to date” to help them feel more confident in their role, or you can give them input or assign them tasks to help them rise to a specific position. As a manager, I believe that performance is just as important, whether it’s a simple “thank you” or a more formal thank you.

Identifying the fundamental reason for a team member’s noncompliance with requirements is critical. Everyone who is straining to deliver resources and equipment should report to you as their first-line manager.

Identify ways to ensure fair and objective formal assessment

To determine remuneration, incentive, promotion, and transfer choices, an assessment of employee performance is necessary. As a result, it has a profound effect on staff morale and motivation (Yu et al., 2020). But when it comes to making judgments on employee transfers, salary, advancement, and recognition, supervisors must use extreme caution. Employee morale suffers when they see their efforts and contributions go unnoticed. The approaches listed below allow managers to conduct performance reviews that are both fair and objective.

Fair Progress System

It is the primary objective of doing an employee evaluation to enhance the performance of the employee and to provide assistance to them. Identifying and correcting implementation hurdles is a joint responsibility of both management and staff ( Bozer et al., 2021). If employees aren’t included in the decision-making process, it might be unreasonable to expect them to return to high levels of performance.

Fair Performance Review

For the assessors to grasp the aims of performance evaluation, the organisation must train them. They should be aware of how the performance review system operates, be able to provide constructive comments and maintain a focus on capabilities and behaviour as opposed to personalities (Yu et al., 2020). When it comes to evaluating their performance, employees should be given the freedom to do so at will.

Fair Report

Even before conducting interviews, managers may reflect on what they’ve seen of their staff in the real world (Bozer et al., 2021). Because a superficial assessment of an employee’s performance cannot provide sufficient and correct information, the management should spend more time observing and recording data to get a more complete picture.

Fair Assessment

Each employee’s job description and how their performance is being evaluated should be clearly stated in an evaluation assessment. Employees and employers benefit from open communication when this type of information is shared.

Explain how to set SMART objectives for a team member

Goals that are measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound are referred to as SMART. An organization’s key success statistics, such as earnings, or the accomplishment of a specific objective are all examples of typical metrics (Jones, 2016).

Good public health practice involves solid objectives to assess improvement in the direction of reaching goals and results. Various programmes and services are supported by awards that involve planning, executing, and achieving goals to guarantee success for future funding. Organizations strive to set meaningful goals that effectively evaluate improvement in the direction of a goal.

The aim must be explicit and not vague or nonspecific, e.g., safety
To determine whether a project is a success, you must first determine whether it can be measured, e.g., patient care
It must be possible to fulfil a goal with the money that is available, e.g., efficiency
The goal or target specified is related to the organization’s objectives and will have an impact on the business, e.g., accuracy
A date is required to compute the mission’s duration, e.g., learning and development

Explain how to set performance standards for a team member

Managers must keep tabs on and establish expectations for their workers’ performance to help them grow professionally. Both managers and team members should be involved in defining and setting performance criteria to guarantee that everyone is on the same page and ready to commit. There is a greater sense of accountability and incentive when employees have a say in determining their performance criteria.

Evaluation

It is of the utmost importance to analyse and revise the job requirements with the workforce and to discuss the kinds of objectives employees should set for themselves. The benchmark must be measurable so that managers can monitor and compare the performance of their employees over time. Comparing performance amongst employees in the same role is made easier when they are measured using metrics.

Past Data

Before setting new performance objectives, it is critical to undertake a thorough analysis of all available historical data on existing goals.

Keeping track of your progress

Make sure everyone knows what they’re expected to accomplish and how they can help the team achieve it. By the end of the month, for example, the salesman must raise sales by 15%.

Frequent Meetings and Open Debate

Regular meetings to discuss and execute new performance requirements should be held on a monthly or every six-week cycle, as appropriate. The end-of-month meeting at Milltech, for example, is used to discuss issues and areas that require development. Regular meetings allow team members to share their thoughts and suggestions for enhancing their work performance.

***Performance Management HRM Project***

Explain how to measure performance against agreed standards

Continual Examination

Many businesses choose to conduct performance evaluations regularly rather than once every few months or once a year. As a result, regular feedback aids in the early detection of issues and the implementation of corrective measures before they worsen.

Checklist

With the use of a checklist, it is simple to track employee performance and identify those employees who are under-performing and may require more support. In addition, it aids in identifying people who require further education and training to perform at a higher level.

Self-Evaluation

To get the greatest results, you should ask your staff to do a self-assessment. Employees who are held accountable for their work may be more concerned about it than the team’s leaders. With the use of this exam, team leaders may help their employees better understand how well they’re performing.

360 Feedback

Using the system, employees from all departments and levels of the organisation may provide input on their ideas, thoughts, comments, and assessments of their performance. When using 360- degree feedback, you may assess input from a wide range of sources, allowing you to see both good and negative trends as well as areas in need of improvement.

Visual Ratings

When it comes to evaluating employee performance, the typical graphical scale employs the digits 1-10. Decision-making and comprehending certain activities can be placed on a scale of one to ten.

Explain the importance of feedback to improve performance

Achieve the expected results and obtain timely feedback from your team members by clearly defining their roles and responsibilities. You’ll gain more self-confidence and feel better about your work if you conduct daily evaluations. It would be a wonderful learning experience for the team member to take advice on failures and faults so that they may reflect on whatever went down and what they can do to avoid making the same mistake again ( Yu et al., 2020).

You must communicate clearly and succinctly with anyone who isn’t meeting the basic criteria of success to be conscious of the necessity for change, and it’s also an excellent beginning point for an open debate about productivity and what the group member can do to improve performance with the support of the manager.

Describe how to give effective feedback during performance management reviews

As a manager, I prefer to use the CORBS feedback approach when I must give an employee feedback.

Make a concise and unambiguous description of the situation or actions
If you’re referring to someone else, use terms and vocabulary like “I feel,” “I believe,” or “you are” instead of “you.”
The default behaviour is to deliver the information to the case in the simplest form imaginable so that it will be remembered
In place of having things go in one direction alone, it is healthy to incorporate both negative and positive feedback
At its most fundamental, the feedback should be concentrated on the enforcement
When confronted with negative feedback in the structured framework, I turn to the BEEF model for support
How a person acts or behaves is known as their comportment
A single illustration of a problem or activity is referred to as an example
The impact is either the impact that something has on someone else or the consequence of something happening
You can have everything you desire in the future, starting right now

Identify potential areas of under-performance in the workplace

Since under-performance may be so costly and detrimental, any organisation should consider addressing the issue. Under-performance can be caused by a variety of factors, including the following:

Lack Of Space For Growth

It’s not uncommon to have employees that don’t care about their performance and are content to show in, do their thing, and go home. Others, on the other hand, are aware of the company’s potential for growth. The lack of room for advancement can have a detrimental influence on an employee’s overall performance. Consequently.

Motivation

There are several common workplace issues, such as employee dissatisfaction, that contribute to under-performance.

Inspiration

It’s impossible to expect good performance from personnel if they aren’t enthused about what they do. Having inspiring executives in the firm, for example, can lead to more motivated employees, which can have a favourable effect on productivity.

A Lack Of Praise And Acknowledgement

When employees feel valued and recognised via the use of incentives, they are more productive. They may, for example, decide to leave and seek employment with another satisfying organisation.

Inadequate Leadership and Effective Performance Management

Disengaged and disorganised managers are less expected to provide a positive work environment, which in turn has a negative influence on team performance and productivity.

Determine the root reasons for performance management shortfalls

An essential part of training is A member of staff who may not be equipped to do their tasks due to a lack of relevant experience or competence. Adding a new task or having a new employee who is unable to learn how to do this work might be to blame.

An example of an impetus is someone on the team who is qualified yet unable to do their duties. Lack of rapport with the supervisor, disinterest in routine tasks, or an unwillingness to complete them is all possible explanations (Bozer et al., 2021). A problem with capacity occurs when a person in our team is doing everything they can and knows to do to finish their task, yet it is still not enough.

This may be the result of problems at work or home, both of which hurt the individual’s performance at work. A systematic problem, such as several teams that don’t operate properly. It’s possible that sharing information or providing services can cause you some headaches.

Describe actions to restore performance management to acceptable levels

To get the results back on track, you need to identify and address the error with your teammate. You should gather evidence to support your claims of under-performance. Recommendation: Copies of previous assessments, ideas, and proposals to enhance performance have also been suggested (Crocker et al., 2016).

A meeting with your team member is necessary once the data has been collected so that you may explain your findings and present the proof you’ve gathered. Try to interact with the member of the team and listen to what they have to say because they are already familiar with the problem and have ideas about how it may be improved. It is possible to work out a plan of action with your supervisor and your team member after this initial discussion (Green et al., 2020).

Retraining on a new task, mentorship and supervision from managers, or a reduction in the workload of team members are all options. Team members who fail to follow and finish this approach, such as through disciplinary measures that might lead to their dismissal, must be fully informed of the consequences.

References

Aboalshamat, K., Al-Zaidi, D., Jawa, D., Al-Harbi, H., Alharbi, R. and Al-Otaibi, S., 2020. The effect of life coaching on psychological distress among dental students: interventional study. BMC psychology, 8(1), pp.1-8.

Arena, D., Perini, S., Taisch, M. and Kiritsis, D., 2018. The Training Data Evaluation Tool: Towards a unified ontology-based solution for industrial training evaluation. Procedia Manufacturing, 23, pp.219-224.

Bozer, G. and Jones, R.J., 2018. Understanding the factors that determine workplace coaching effectiveness: A systematic literature review. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27(3), pp.342-361.

Bozer, G. and Jones, R.J., 2021. Introduction to the special issue on advances in the psychology of workplace coaching. Applied Psychology, 70(2), pp.411-419.

Crocker, J., Shields, K.F., Venkataramanan, V., Saywell, D. and Bartram, J., 2016. Building capacity for water, sanitation, and hygiene programming: Training evaluation theory applied to CLTS management training in Kenya. Social Science & Medicine, 166, pp.66-76.

Green, S., Grant, A.M. and Rynsaardt, J., 2020. Evidence‐based life coaching for senior high school students: Building hardiness and hope. Coaching Researched: A Coaching Psychology Reader, pp.257-268.

Jones, R., 2016. The effectiveness of workplace coaching: A meta-analysis of learning and performance management outcomes; scale development; theoretical model of individual differences and longitudinal study (Doctoral dissertation, Aston University).

Jones, R.J., Woods, S.A. and Guillaume, Y.R., 2016. The effectiveness of workplace coaching: A meta‐analysis of learning and performance outcomes from coaching. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 89(2), pp.249-277.

Phillips, J.J. and Phillips, P.P., 2016. Handbook of training evaluation and measurement methods. Routledge.

Yu, N., Collins, C.G., Cavanagh, M., White, K. and Fairbrother, G., 2020. Positive coaching with front-line managers: enhancing their effectiveness and understanding why. Coaching Researched: A Coaching Psychology Reader, pp.269-283.

Relevant Performance Management Posts

Managing Team Performance

Leadership Strategies for Improving Performance Dissertation

HR Dissertation Topics

Did you find any useful knowledge relating to performance management in this post? What are the key facts that grabbed your attention? Let us know in the comments. Thank you.

HR Performance Issues

HR Performance Issues and Motivation

HR Performance Issues and Motivation – “Do not discipline employees who are unable to perform a task. Discipline those who are able to perform a task, but are unwilling or unmotivated to succeed” – SANS Leadership and Management Competencies course book (Bong, 2014)

Understanding the motivations of employees in order to identify and correct performance issues is fundamental to effective Human Resource management.

Because of this, there is a wealth of research related to understanding the underlying causes and effects of good and bad employee performance. The goal is to figure out where the problem originates and to develop ways to correct those problems.

Motivation theories are abundant but all originate from the experts considered to be fathers of motivation theory; Maslow and Herzberg. Early motivation theorists like Abraham Maslow and Frederick Hertzberg, laid the foundation upon which modern motivation theory is built. Their work has guided research in this area of study since the late 1950’s and early 60’s (Hendriks, 1999).

Yet as the workplace has evolved and diversified over the last several decades, so have the perspectives on motivation theory. The foundation has remained the same, but the perspectives are changing and elaborating what was original hypothesized by Maslow and Herzberg.

Take for instance Maslow’s need hierarchy theory. Maslow theorized that human motivation is driven by five needs: the need for shelter or safety, food and water, love and respect, recognition and fulfillment. These needs are organized in a hierarchy based on basic needs and “higher-order” needs; food and shelter are basic needs, recognition, love, fulfillment and respect are higher-order needs (Hendriks, 1999).

Hertzberg, on the other hand, proposes just two categories in his motivational theory. Herzberg concludes that people are motivated by either extrinsic or intrinsic motives (Gagne & Deci, 2005). Mainly, this theory says that either a person is motivated because they like what they are doing, or, they are motivated based on the expectation that they will be rewarded in some way for the work they are doing.

Both theories suggest that employee satisfaction is important to motivation and that in order to keep employees motivated, their needs must continue to be satisfied. Maslow’s theory falls short of prescriptive answers to questions of employee motivation, whereas Hertzberg suggests that employers can maintain employee satisfaction by considering the intrinsic and extrinsic motives of their employees when adopting rewards incentives (Davoren, 2013).

HR Performance Theories

While Maslow and Herzberg’s theories in their broader applications have become less applicable as the workforce and workplace has changed, the fundamental basis of these theories is still sound and relevant to current motivational theory.

Among some of the more recent expansions on motivation theory include the Commitment and Necessary Effort (CANE) motivation Model, Self-Determination Theory (SDT) and the Cognitive Evaluation Theory (CET). Motivation theory has been applied to understanding motivation in many different areas, including in sports, academic achievement and business. These theories applied in business can help solve HR performance issues and improve employee motivation.

The CANE motivation model tries to incorporate the many different aspects of motivation theory. It takes the best approaches of modern research, and combines them into one all-encompassing theory that can be used to understand the motivations of professionals with knowledge based jobs (Clark, 1998). These types of jobs, white collar jobs that require some expertise and professional knowledge, usually involve incentives for attracting highly educated professionals. Understanding the interaction of rewards systems and motivators that guide those professionals is very important for HR recruitment.

Clark argues that some strategies in the area of organizational development overestimate the effect that employee incentives like contests and performance recognition have on employee motivation (Clark, 1998). These strategies are widely used as a means to increase worker productivity. However, some research studies have suggested that studies that show that these strategies work to improve motivation are “fatally flawed” and that these strategies may not have as much power to influence employee behavior as previously thought (Clark, 1998).

The CANE Model says that motivation is two-pronged and intertwined. First, motivation is based on commitment to a goal. The second is the amount of effort that goes into achieving that goal (Clark, 1998). If an employee is motivated by a commitment to achieving their goal, he or she will remain focused on that goal even if they are tempted to focus on other less important goals. Once that level of commitment is achieved, the effort needed to achieve the goal, or the “Necessary Effort”, will sustain the motivation to complete the task. If the task is perceived as important, then the necessary effort to complete the task is tied to its importance.

Though Maslow and Herzberg’s theories are becoming outdated, the CANE Model falls short of unifying motivation theory into one model because of its limitations in broad application. It is too broad to explain the nuance effects that culture and diversity have on individual definitions of commitment, effectiveness and control (Clark, 1998). Not to mention that broad solutions to problems of motivation in the workplace can only be identified by this model; applying those solutions to specific job performances is more difficult and requires more specialized solutions.

Self-Determination Theory has evolved not only through theoretical analysis but has also held up in empirical studies. SDT relies heavily on needs based theory, but the needs are more psychological in nature. Satisfying these psychological needs, according to Self-Determination Theory, motivates behavior and also elucidates the processes that direct action (Gagne’ & Deci, 2005).

In this theory, by determining underlying psychological needs, employers can appeal to the intrinsic motivations of employees to correct performance issues and to increase motivation. Intrinsic motivation is driven by internal satisfaction. This involves the motivation that comes from being engaged in an activity that brings personal satisfaction. It is unrelated to any material reward. An employee is motivated by a psychological need to be challenged or to feel a sense of accomplishment (Ryan & Deci, 2000).

Since all behaviors are at their core driven psychologically, research in the area of Self-Determination Theory has tried to discern which of these psychological needs are being fulfilled by intrinsic motivation. What has been concluded is that intrinsic motivation can be encouraged and facilitated by environment since intrinsic motivation is not caused but rather “catalyzed” into action when the conditions are right (Ryan & Deci, 2000).”

Lastly, Cognitive Evaluation Theory (CET) which is one aspect of Self-Determination Theory finds that intrinsic motivation can be produced by offering encouragement and feedback that satisfies a sense of accomplishment and competence in employees (Ryan & Deci, 2000). This can be done using rewards for achievement; a bonus for timely turnaround or for reaching a sales goal. But employees can also be intrinsically motivated by words of encouragement that satisfy the same psychological need for feeling competent; a pat on the back or a ‘good job’ goes a long way.

HR Performance and Job Satisfaction

Work performance is directly affected by job satisfaction and motivation. The work performance is the outcome. When working from the intrinsic motivation model, appealing to the internal psychological needs of employees can increase job satisfaction, which in turn sparks motivation and finally produces an improved work performance. Understanding the means to increase job satisfaction is the crux of resolving performance issues and positively motivating employees.

Solutions to performance issues should be evaluated at all levels. Just because an employee is not performing satisfactorily doesn’t mean that the problem lies with the employee. Sometimes, the problem is in management style or a lack of resources to do the job right. These things can exacerbate poor performances when the employee feels that they are not being given the proper tools to complete their job or receiving the necessary feedback to do the job correctly (Lister, 2012). By simply rewarding exceptional behavior or providing constructive feedback for poor performance, an employer can improve job satisfaction and thereby resolve performance issues.

Therefore, assessing the needs of the group can allow employers to predict how those assessments will effect “job satisfaction and work outcome” (Gagne & Deci, 2005). Also, evaluating the types of needs that are being satisfied can affect job satisfaction and outcome. Herzberg presents two different factors in employee motivation. There are hygiene factors, the more superficial needs, and the motivation factors, which include more intrinsic motives.

Among hygiene factors that Herzberg identified are things like salary and work conditions. Motivation factors on the other hand, include things like personal achievement, opportunities for promotion, and a sense of responsibility (Hendriks, 1999). These factors have a direct and indirect effect on job satisfaction and performance. Hygiene factors according to Herzberg’s theory mostly affect motivation in a negative way; by the very absence of things like good working conditions and status, job satisfaction is decreased (Hendriks, 1999).

Consider a garbage man whose job performance has gone down. His work has slowed and he seems clearly dissatisfied with his job. Upon evaluation, HR has discovered that the employee is dissatisfied with his salary. He has been on the job for several years without promotion and without pay increases. According to both Maslow and Herzberg’s theories of motivation, his job dissatisfaction is rooted in one of his intrinsic and basic needs not being met; salary, food and shelter.

But further analysis supports Herzberg’s theory that there is a second prong to this employee’s dissatisfaction. He has not received a promotion, which is more than mere dissatisfaction with his salary; it implies that he is dissatisfied because he is not receiving the recognition that he feels that he deserves for the time and commitment he has given to his employer. By not relating to the psychological need for recognition, which has its own intrinsic reward for the employee, the employer is partly to blame for the performance issue and lack of motivation.

To resolve the problem, the employer must first identify the causes of the problem and then seek to improve job satisfaction through proper motivation. In this scenario, showing that management cares about his input and recognizes his many years of contribution by giving him a raise or a new promotion or job title, can help to resolve those performance issues by appealing to the intrinsic and extrinsic motivations of the employee.

Work Cited

Bong, K. (2014 ) Management Laboratory. Retrieved from Sans Technology Institute:

Clark, R. E. (1998). Motivating Performance: Part 1 – Diagnosing and Solving Motivation Problems. Performance Improvement. Los Angeles: University of Southern California.

Davoren, J. (2013) What Types of Rewards Would Motivate Workers in an Organization?

Gagne’, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 331-362.

Hendriks, P. (1999). Why Share Knowledge? The Influence of ICT on the Motivation for Knowledge Sharing. Knowledge and Process Management , 91-100.

Lister, J. (2012). Examples of a Motivational Issue in an Organization.

Pintrich, P. R. (2000). An Achievement Goal Theory Perspective on Issues in Motivation Terminology, Theory, and Research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 92-104.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 54-67.