Consumer Perception of the Effectiveness of Cryptocurrency in Day To Day Financial Operations – Dissertation
Cryptocurrency has not received that much attention from IS (Information Systems) and as a consequence of this, there is still a gap in the literature with a great potential for research, specifically how the technology fares within the consumer context. Most notably, this dissertation is interested at the traction Cryptocurrency is gaining in today’s economy and how consumers are responding to this innovation. This dissertation will broadly present the evolution of Cryptocurrency, its financial characteristics, and what factors influence its value formation. The focus will then shift at the underlying models that are used both in a practical and academic setting to illustrate the factors that contribute to the acceptance and diffusion of a new technology. The conceptual model will be based on the Innovation Diffusion Theory of Everett Rogers.
Using a specifically designed questionnaire, consumer opinions are quantified in order to ascertain current attitudes and beliefs. Furthermore, after examining specifically designed hypothesis that deal with technology adoption, it was discovered that pivotal factors such as complexity, relative benefits and education play a distinct role in the uptake of Cryptocurrency. This is important because as a new technological instrument, Cryptocurrency opens the door to a number of opportunities for consumers, but only after overcoming a number of challenges and limitations that might prevent it to be accepted.
Thus, the aim is to investigate the monetary characteristics of a financial innovation in conjunction with the sociological component. This will lead to a better understanding of the constructs that influence the decision to adopt a novel technology by looking at a number of social and psychological factors. An overview of the leading technology adoption theories is provided that will address a number of cognitive, effective and contextual factors. While the study could potentially draw from all these theories, the Innovation Diffusion Theory of Everett Rogers will serve as a foundation, and all the assumptions will be based on this particular model.
What is the consumer response regarding the use of cryptocurrencies in day to day financial operations?
The main objective of this dissertation is to determine the level of consumer awareness, perception and degree of utilisation.
What are the main factors that influence the consumer intention to adopt cryptocurrencies?
1 – Introduction Background and Context The Rationale for the Research Research Objectives
2 – Literature Review The Evolution of Cryptocurrency What Is Cryptocurrency And What Is It Based On? What Gives Cryptocurrencies Value? Difference between Cryptocurrency and Traditional FIAT Currency Cryptocurrency Nomenclature Advantages and Disadvantages in using Cryptocurrency Advantages Disadvantages Technology Adoption Theories Hypothesis
3 – Methodology Research Philosophy Research Approach Research Design and Strategy Sample Size and Population Ethical Considerations Data Analysis
According to Christensen et al. (2015), corporate tax avoidance means using the legal strategies to adjust the financial circumstances of an individual to lower the amount of tax the said individual is owing to the state. Corporate tax is achieved through claiming permissible credits and deductions. Most often, corporate tax avoidance is usually confused with tax evasion. Although the two phrases could sound similar, however, Armstrong et al. (2015) believe that tax evasion applies illegal techniques like under reporting the income of an individual to make him or her avoid paying the taxes. According to Sikka (2010) tax avoidance strategy of a given corporation is an ‘organized hypocrisy.’
Avoidance Strategy as an Organized Hypocrisy
I agree with Sikka’s Term that tax
avoidance is an organized hypocrisy. Just to mention, companies tend to excel
at speaking on social responsibilities when at the same time they devising structures
to enable them evade paying taxes. The tenacity of corporate tax avoidance as
well as the evasion lures a devotion to organized hypocrisy which can be
properly comprehended as the gaps that exist between the decision, the action
and the corporate talk, (Brunsson, 1989, 2003). Corporate tax avoidance is
indeed an organized hypocrisy. In particular, a case of WorldCom, which is a US
telecommunications organization, collapsed amid of allegations of fraud in the
year 2002. Consequently, the second reason why I agree with Sikka’s claim that
corporate tax avoidance is an organized hypocrisy is the case of KPMG that was borrowed
in 1997 considering the initial fee of three million dollars. Later, KPMG
recouped a half a million dollars fee which meant to carter for the feasibility
study. Notably, the organization proceeded to earn the bonuses of performance totaling
to extra two million dollars.
Main Costs of Tax Avoidance
According to Koester, Shevlin, and
Wangerin, tax avoidance will keep on inflicting and results to costly
consequences to millions of individuals as long as the leaders of low-income
countries are excluded from the tax avoidance solution (2016). Notably, in July
2014 at Los Angeles College, President Obama proclaimed loudly that those who
employed creative measures to ensure their taxes were reduced were merely
corporate deserters renouncing their citizenship to shield profits. Gaertner
(2014) reveals that such strategies by individuals to avoid corporate tax have
severe costs. There are five main cost types which are generated by companies
and individuals vigorously avoid tax.
First, the authorities handling tax collection attempt to counter ingenious tax avoidance practice and institute new opinions and regulations which in turn become supplementary to the tax code. Although the purpose of this measure is to increase certainty, however, the end results is a convoluted tax which leads to the second cost of tax avoidance which is corporate compliance cost.
The third cost of corporate tax avoidance is increasing the cost of administration. Forth, tax avoidance encourages the formation of lobbyists and tax specialist industries which are created to exploit the system. The last main cost of tax avoidance is the loss of the government revenue. According to Hanlon (1994) and Sikka (2003), the federal government of the United States losses fifty to one hundred and seventy billion dollars annually due to tax avoidance.
Key Issue Surrounding Tax Avoidance
According to the Guardian on 30th March 2009, developing countries often receives approximately one hundred and twenty billion dollars from G20 countries in the foreign aid in which the said developing countries are losing an approximate amount of between eight billion and one trillion dollars from the unlawful financial outflow every year to the countries of the west (Kar & Cartwright-Smith, 2008). As Baker (2005) and Cobham (2005), about five hundred billion dollars is lost over a variety of corporate tax avoidance structures in which a substantial amount is attributed to price practices which shifts profits from the developing countries to already developed countries.
Tax is a major cost to many companies and they formulate strategies which ensure that such costs are minimized thus causing tax avoidance. According to Finch (2004), although rules still remain to be rules, nevertheless, they are prone to be broken and thus no matter which legislations are in place, the lawyers and the accountants will always find a way around the game of tax avoidance. Multinational is the leading case studies of tax avoidance since they have multiple locations which allow them to organize profits in those countries which are favorable tax regimes (Bowler, 2009).
Moral and Economic Implications of Corporate Tax Avoidance
In my own thoughts, corporate tax avoidance
has negative moral and economic implications. The company which avoids tax uses
the definition of CSR and also relies on a set of moral principles to assess
their taxpaying behaviors using the lens of morality and ethics. However, moral
reasoning is more complex than one can imagine. Following the thoughts of KMPG
(2006), tax payment forms a key responsibility in the contemporary corporation.
Some people usually consider paying corporate tax as a moral problem although
others find it as being moral while a good portion will find the payment of
corporate tax as an immorality. On the other hand, economic implication of
corporate tax is that it makes accounting companies be capitalist and thus
cannot buck the system pressure to raise their own profits thus creating new
tax avoidance schemes and reducing the contribution to the government (Sikka,
2005). When the tax is not collected fully, the accumulated tax compels the
government to stop spending in critical areas like welfare and schools which
leads to underdevelopment.
Ways in Which Corporate Tax Avoidance can be Restricted
I think that there are ways that can be used to restrict corporate tax avoidance. First is through legislation. Legislation can be achieved through standardizing corporate reporting systems to make the government process information and also compare taxes across firms to see who is avoiding the corporate tax. The legislation should aid in the detection of fraud and strictly monitor a company’s insiders on the matters of tax.
The legislation on the tax avoidance can be enforced through well-functioning courts through playing the central importance of law enforcement of the contracting parties. The other way in which tax avoidance can be restricted is through ensuring proper accounting standards. Leuz et al report that proper accounting standards bring about a global reporting coverage than often thought (2003). Single sets of accounting cannot sufficiently compare reporting and disclose any malpractice.
Harmonization of Accounting Standards- Implementation and
It is argued that there should be
standardization of the accounting policy among nations to fully realize the
global economy. Harmonization of accounting standards facilitates international
transactions as well as minimizing the costs of exchange through the provision
of standardized information to the world’s economy. The harmonization is done
by the International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC), the International
Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and the International Financial Reporting
Standards (IFRS). The said bodies are mandated to implement the accounting
standards across the world. However, there are challenges faced during the
implementation. First is the challenge of comparability. Comparability can be achieved
through like things looking alike as well as unlike things looking unlike
(Trueblood, 1966). According to Truebold, “things” in the accounting include
the regulatory culture, the culture of auditing, the culture of account as well
as the financial and business culture. The other challenge is associated with
the problem of interpretation in which language is a problem when translating
IFRS from English or to English.
Most accounting standards are limited in bringing convergence. It should be noted that adopting a single set of accounting cannot be sufficient to allow comparability as well as disclose relevant practice even if the said principles are compulsory to all the countries. However, the idea of adopting common sets of accounting standards cause more comparable reporting techniques as well as high-quality accounting standards like the IFRS (Leuz et al. 2003). Adopting IFRS requires that the party countries must have the asset pricing market which provides accounting values.
High accounting standards cause high quality and transparent reporting to most companies. In addition, IFRS causes economic benefits as well as cost saving. When harmonizing the accounting standards, there is a challenge of public versus private owned enterprises which includes the related party transactions. Following the observation above, the issue of comparability in accounting becomes a problem because tricky auditing problems arises (Leuz et al. 2003).
The harmonization of accounting standards requires
the implementation guidance. According to Baker (2005), the IFRS have the
implementation guidance to the accounting standards either through the non-authoritative
guides or being standard themselves. For instance, IFRS issued the share-based
guidance which is made up of forty four paragraphs relating to the application
guidance. Similarly, the body issued non-authoritative guidance which guides
the implementation of IFRS to guide the harmonization of the accounting
standards. The IASB body on the other hand created the international financial
reporting interpretation committee which oversees the share-based payment
guidance. However, Trueblood (1966) believes that the countries and enterprises
which apply the IFRS in their accounting standards will become more
heterogonous in terms of the size, the jurisdiction, the ownership structure as
well as the structure of the capital and there will be an increase the degree
of accounting sophistications.
According to Brunsson (1989), the
international convergence on the harmonization of standards demands that the
implementation of IFRS policies and guidance must be increased in order to
achieve the intended accounting standards. The scholar adds that if the IASB
committee fails to respond to the demands concerning the detailed
implementation guide of the accounting standards, then the preparers of the
harmonized standards must look for the implementation guidance from elsewhere.
The preparers can turn to EITF consensus to obtain answers to the questions
concerning the application of IFRS. On the contrary, the form of convergence
generated above is not as a result of cooperative behavior or the joint
decision but as a result of auditors and preparers who seek guidance from a
non-IASB credible source.
The implementation of the harmonization of the accounting standards exhibits a challenge in which the individual party countries’ financial reporting outcomes which are partly determined by the requirements of the accounting standards and partly by the incentives. The premise of the financial reporting outcome is that the accounting standards requires sufficient judgment by the preparers and auditors so that the figures reported are materially affected by the incentives of the financial reporting outcomes and the requirements of the accounting standards. Nevertheless, the typical relationship between the accounting standards and the incentives of the financial reporting outcomes is not well understood which forms part of the challenges in the implementation of accounting standards.
Leuz et al. (2003) institute that allowing the adoption of the IFRS will allow for the test of incentives that interacts with two or more standard regimes within the accounting standards. Warfield et al (1995) reveals that the financial reporting outcome is majorly affected by the ownership structure of the international accounting structure. The evidence which is available on the above claim reveals the marked specific jurisdiction differences in the ownership structure that affects the harmonization of the accounting standards.
La Porta et al. (1999) have analyzed the ultimate ownerships of the mid and large size firms in the twenty seven wealthy countries and identified four types of ultimate owners who play a key role in the accounting standards. The types include the public held non-financial institutions, the public owned financial institutions, the families and individuals as well as the state. The ownership structure of an enterprise needs to be considered before making implementations on the harmonization of the accounting standards.
Harmonization of the accounting standards requires the globalization of the trends involving the technology as well as globalization of finance. In the United States comparability of the financial data is one of the major driving forces behind the accounting standards. The comparability has been within the companies of the United States until 1980s where they began focusing on the capital markets. Some countries prefer comparability while others do not (Leuz et al. 2003). In 1991 the FASB board was challenged to become more actively involved in globalizing trends and the internationalization of the accounting standards. The plan published by FASB instituted the objectives for achieving comparability between the accounting standards of the United States and the major national standards-setting bodies.
Christopher S., Jennifer L. Blouin, Alan D. Jagolinzer, and David F. Larcker.
“Corporate governance, incentives, and tax avoidance.” Journal
of Accounting and Economics 60, no. 1 (2015): 1-17.
Avoidance: Some Evidence and Issues.
Accounting Forum, Vol. 29(3), 325-343.
Baker, R.W. (2005), Capitalism‘s Achilles Heel, New Jersey: John Wiley.
Beresford, D.R., Katzenbach, N. and Rogers
Jr., C.B. (2003). Report Of Investigation by The Special Investigative
Committee of the Board Of Directors Of WorldCom, Inc. Washington DC.
Bowler, T. (2009, February). Countering tax avoidance in the UK: Which way forward? Institute for Fiscal Studies. Discussion Paper No. 7.
Brunsson. N. (1989), ―The Organization of
Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions and Actions in Organizations‖, John Wiley,
D. M., Dhaliwal, D. S., Boivie, S., & Graffin, S. D. (2015). Top management
conservatism and corporate risk strategies: Evidence from managers’ personal
political orientation and corporate tax avoidance. Strategic Management
Journal, 36(12), 1918-1938.
Christensen, J. and Murphy, R. (2004), ―The
Social Responsibility of Corporate Tax Avoidance: Taking CSR to the Bottom
Line‖, Development, Vol. 47 No. 3, pp. 37-44.
Cobham, A. (2005). ―Working Paper 129: Tax Evasion, Tax Avoidance, and Development Finance‖. The University of Oxford Finance and Trade Policy Research Centre.
F. B. (2014). CEO After‐Tax compensation incentives
and corporate tax avoidance. Contemporary Accounting Research, 31(4),
Hanlon, G., (1994). The Commercialisation
of Accountancy: Flexible Accumulation and the Transformation of the Service
Class, London: Macmillan.
Kar, D. and Cartwright-Smith, D. (2008). Illicit Financial Flows from Developing Countries: 2002—2006. Washington DC: Global Financial Integrity.
A., Shevlin, T., & Wangerin, D. (2016). The role of managerial ability in
corporate tax avoidance. Management Science, 63(10),
KPMG, (2005). ―KPMG International Annual Review 2005, KPMG.
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F.,
Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. (1998) Law and finance, Journal of Political
Economy, 106, pp. 1113–1155.
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F. and Shleifer, A. (1999) Corporate ownership around the world, Journal of Finance, 54, pp. 471–517.
Leuz, C., Nanda, D. and Wysocki, P. (2003). ‘Earnings management and investor protection: an international comparison’. Journal of Financial Economics, 69: 505– 527.
Sikka, P. and Hampton, M.P. (2005). The Role of Accountancy Firms in Tax.
Trueblood, R.M., 1966. Accounting
principles: the board and its problems, in Empirical Research in Accounting:
Selected Studies 1966, The Institute of Professional Accounting, Graduate
School of Business, The University of Chicago, Chicago, pp. 183–191.
US Bankruptcy Court Southern District of New York, (2004). Third and Final Report of the Insolvency Examiner: In re WORLDCOM, INC., et al, Chapter 11, Case No. 02-13533 (AJG), Kirkpatrick & Lockhart LLP, Washington DC.
Werther Jr., W.B., and Chandler, D., (2005). Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility: Stakeholders in a Global Environment. London: Sage.
The issue of monetary and fiscal policy within the EU is strongly debated at this moment in time. This is particularly true with the unconventional monetary policies being put in place for the first time by the European Central Bank such as quantitative easing; as the economy looks to recover from the sovereign debt crisis of 2008. This dissertation seeks to answer the following research questions: (1) Was the lack of a fiscal union a key contributing factor to the crisis? (2) Can a monetary union be effective without a unified fiscal policy to support it? (3) Has there been increased conformity in these key indicators since the crisis?
With these questions in mind, a literature review is undertaken to discuss and analyse the key issues within the European Union and beliefs and approaches regarding fiscal and monetary policy, including the heavily debated topic of whether or not a fiscal union is required. This dissertation also carries out a study of income and corporate taxation rates and expenditure figures for seven key EU countries in order to answer the above research questions.
A clear pattern of convergence is seen in the taxation rates and allows us to conclude that there has been increased conformity in key fiscal indicators since the sovereign debt crisis of 2008. We then link these findings back to the literature review and show that they fit with the beliefs of a large amount of previous academic work in the field. Our findings suggest that there has been increased fiscal conformity since the crisis and also that the lack of fiscal conformity (not necessarily achieved through the presence of a fiscal union) was a key contributing factor to the crisis.
Finally we also find that there can be an improved level of fiscal conformity without a fiscal union within a monetary union however we are unable to say conclusively that a monetary union can be effective without a unified fiscal policy.
This finance dissertation aims to establish the answer to a number of questions that stem from the 2008 European sovereign debt crisis:
Was the lack of a fiscal union a key contributing factor to the crisis?
Can a monetary union be effective without a unified fiscal policy to support it?
Has there been increased conformity in key fiscal indicators since the crisis?
Fiscal Policy Dissertation Contents
1 – Introduction Overview of Research Aims and Strategy Research Motivation Introducing Monetary and Fiscal Policy The Maastricht Treaty and the Stability and Growth Pact Overview of Structure
2 – Literature Review Can a monetary union be effective without the support of a fiscal union? A monetary union can be effective without the support of a fiscal union A monetary union cannot be effective without the support of a fiscal union Was the lack of fiscal union a key reason behind the 2008 sovereign debt crisis? The lack of a fiscal union was not a key reason behind the crisis The lack of a fiscal union was a key reason behind the crisis Shortcomings in the literature: Has there been increased fiscal conformity since the sovereign debt crisis hit? Changing Role of the European Central Bank Summarising the Literature Anti Fiscal Union Pro Fiscal Union Lack of Fiscal Union was not key to Sovereign Debt Crisis Lack of Fiscal union was key to Sovereign Debt Crisis
3 – Research Methodology Sample Selection Criteria Hypotheses Development and Reliability Data Top Band Personal Income Tax Rates (%)
4 – Findings Income Tax Data Corporate Tax Data Total Tax Data Government Expenditure Data Implications of Findings
5 – Conclusion Summary of the Results and their Implications Limitations Suggested Areas for Future Research
International Financial Management – Evaluate the extent to which the bargaining model can be viewed as a practical implementation of the law of comparative advantage?
International financial management is a coined term in today’s world, and it is also known as International Finance. In simple words, it means financial management in an International business environment. International Financial Management is, however, different countries and regions due to the different currencies, government situations, political situations, deficient markets, varied opportunity sets (Susan, & Anil 2009, pp. 381–399)
It is said that international financial management came into the limelight when countries started opening up their borders due to the liberation and globalization policies that came with capitalism. Because of the open borders and increased freedom to conduct business in any country around the world. Entrepreneurs started to source for raw materials and establish their business in different countries provided that the state met the preferences of the entrepreneur (Wissam & Ellen 2014). The development of liberalization was further enhanced by the swift move towards development of telecommunication and transport technologies. Financial innovations such as currency derivatives, multi-currency bonds, cross-border stock listing and International mutual funds further catalyzed the development of international financial management (Frederic et al. 2010, pp. 395-427).
Globalization and Multi-national Firm
has manifested itself in today’s world through the relationship of financial
markets, increasing roles of the multinational corporations, the dependence of
the local economies on foreign trade, transfer of technologies. This type of
relationship has led to demands for harmonization of the world statically
standards (Susan, & Anil 2009, pp. 381–399). Harmonization
and standardization include updating the National Accounts System and the
Balances of payment among other systems that would make the exchange of capital
easier. Multinational firms have contributed a lot towards international
financial management, in fact, MNCs are the focal point for the studies of
International Financial Management. Globalization has enabled companies to
expand their territories to different countries and regions. For example
countries like NIKE, Nescafé, and Shell Oil among others are present in almost
the whole world.
According to Frederic et al. (2010, pp. 395-427), the structure of the global industry has
experienced great changes especially in the 1990s due to the cross-border
mergers and acquisitions; this is evident since most companies committing their
affairs freely with stakeholders in different parts of the world is becoming
standard. A massive increment by $200 billion to more than $500 billion in
cross-border mergers was recorded in a span of only 2years i.e. from 1995 to
1999. This lead to the healthy of business especially to the advanced
developing countries like Taiwan and Hong Kong who are currently leading in
investing in China and other South East Asia countries. In South America
Brazilian and Chilean firms have dominated the region. In the same sense,
Brazil and Argentina based companies have reciprocated. Korean companies
overseas are roughly one-third of the massive domestic investments during 1999.
Due to this
traffic foreign investment and trade have developed to become inter-wined.
There are exports of foreign affiliates in developing states to the parent
organizations overseas. This accounts for one-third of all the exports that
originate from developing countries while two-thirds of the developing states
involve a multinational buyer or seller. In the least developed countries,
these ratios are probably higher because of the advantage that Multinational
Corporations take over the cheap labor available in these countries. The rise
of Multinational companies and foreign ownership has given various opinions
about their effects on the developing countries.
International Financial Management and International Monetary Systems
Chiara et al. (2010, pp. 42-65), outlines that the international monetary system involves the management of money flows in conjunction with institutions that are government related that keep track of vast bulk of money including supporting currency needs and it also ensures payment obligations within and across countries are met accordingly. Various institutions that are responsible and are part of the international monetary system include the central banks international financial institutions, commercial banks, and some monetary market funds.
Wissam and Ellen (2014), adds that one distinguishing factor that makes IMS different from other financial institutions is that IMS is not interest bearing. Instead, money is considered as a unit of account and also means of exchanging goods and service and capital flows across borders in order to facilitate and ensure a perfect environment for exchange of financial assets and the excellent of financial markets. The commonly known definition of money since time immemorial is that it’s an asset in addition to its storage of value.
The USD has
incurred changes that have been unheard of especially the one noted in 1985
where the dollar had hit a peak of USD 100 Billion a year. According to most
economists was far much beyond the equilibrium level that has ever been
attained. This record was due to the high exchanging rate which was a sign of
confidence in the US economy, the high rate of exchange was due to the sticker
hypothesis of the Dornbusch to fiscal irresponsibility. It was then decided
that the dollar value be lower without considering much what took it high by
intervening in the foreign exchange markets, this was done for the
protectionist sentiment that conducted the US Congress that was mounting
agreement that was formed by the big five countries i.e. united states France
Japan great Britain and West Germany, a coordinated program to reach the target
of forcing down the enormously shooting US dollar value against other
currencies, the program worked perfect was successful in the end. It lost 11
percent of its SDR in 1986, the decrement of the US dollar was steady when
Italy and Canada joined the group 5, forming a new group known as the G-7.The
policies worked like a charm, and the US promised to cut the budget deficit and
ultimately lower the rate at which the dollar was growing. To achieve this
further Japan and Canada promised to stimulate their economies, although they
achieved the reduction of the dollar value the budget cuts weren’t forthcoming
and so Germany and Japan never succeeded in their mission to stimulate their
economies (Arthur 2003, pp. 979-992).
Trade is among the factors in addition to inequities that balances out countries in todays world. These fluctuations in a system of a freely floating exchange of goods and services gives the adjustment system to bring trade back to balances. A country that has both trade and account deficit could get back to balance through devaluing its currency which will increase its exports and lessen the amount of imports (Chiara et al. 2010, pp. 42-65).
In reality the existence of chronic trade deficits in country have consequences to the economy through the systems of flexible exchange rate. One of the main reason for the failure in adjustment of exchange rates is deficit for incentives for various states to keep their currency strong in order to attract foreign investments. But according to the reports by the World Bank over valued currencies only impairs trade more while calling for more inflow of foreign currencies. Finally the game reaches the end and the investors run away and the deficit country have a fall in their currency that erodes even the domestic savings and ushers in inflation and these leads to the international financial management emergency assistance that is directed towards economic austerity.
World Bank statistics recognizes the fact that a mechanism of semi-fixed exchange rates that provides for flexibility in a narrow range and orderly mechanism for adjustments for such ranges. In 1994 the former chairman of the Bretton Woods Commission Volcker Paul openly condemned the liberation of the exchange rates and advocated for the semi-fixed exchange rate regime (Jean et al. 2005, pp. 1-43). In exchange for the Bretton Woods Institution (World Bank and IMF) the countries suffering from deficits are expected to implement a range of deflationary fiscal and deflationary policies, in the late 1990s they were known as Structural Adjustment Program and mostly implemented through letters of intent. The process is usually refer to us loan conditionality’s since IMF financial assistance are conditioned when implementing policy reforms (Xiaoying & Xiaming 2005, pp. 393-407).
Foreign Direct Investments
The rise of
foreign Direct Investment started over tree decades ago. From 1980s when the
FDI flow was estimated to be 50 billion US Dollars per year OFD has grown up to
2.1 trillion US Dollars in 2007. Due to the economic recession in 2008 FDI fell
down to 1.9 trillion US Dollars that is -10% (James
& Mark 2000). Foreign direct Investments from developed countries
have increased due to the high growth in economies and high performance from
the corporate world of these countries.
particularly flows from the European Union and The United States of America who
take up to 84%, the remaining 16% is represented by the transitional economies
International financial management, the distribution of emerging market OFDI has evolved considerably changed over the past years. Asia overtook Latin America and Caribbean America has become leading region for Foreign Direct Investment. While MNCs have become fundamental investors in many developing countries, they have also invested in developed countries. The general number of Multinational Corporations has been growing in tandem, with FDI (Caroline 2004, pp. 20-29). This rise does not only show the increasing ownership benefits of these firms but also the pressure for the companies to get a portfolio locality assets as foundation for International competitiveness (Arthur 2003, pp. 979-992).
The Bargaining Model
According to the theory of bargaining, governments yearn for development and a stability payment balance. These goals can be achieved through attracting foreign investments. On the other hand, MNCs are in constant look for sources of raw materials and strategic manufacturing points near their targeted markets. These objectives can be satisfied when MNCs deal successfully with governments of host countries because it is through the sovereignty of the states that the MNCs can achieve these Governments seek economic development and balance-of-payments stability, for example, and both goals can be pursued by attracting and channeling the activities of foreign TNCs. TNCs seek inexpensive sources of raw materials and manufacturing sites (Chiara et al. 2010, pp. 42-65). According to Jean et al. (2005, pp. 1-43).The bargaining process is enhanced by the relative resources that each country has.
The government has its high points from the control over the two most fundamental requirement of the MNCs which are raw materials and intensive labor. On the other hand, the MNCs have goodies that the government desires that they use to influence the government with some of these goodies include helping in lowering the unemployment rate in the country, improving the host countries balance of payments through providing access to the International Markets (Arthur 2003, pp. 979-992). The relevance of these factors during the bargaining process substantially determines the expected outcome of negotiation between an MNC and the national government. Another factor that greatly influences the negotiation process is the situation between the firm and the government. The relative stakes that each party offers give a situation affecting the bargaining outcome.
Lastly the degree
of similarity of interests that both the government and the multinational
corporation have. The Similarity of interests makes negotiation more natural
and smooth while different and parallel interests among the principles will
make decision making very hard (Arthur 2003, pp.
The Balance of Payments in International Financial Management
According to Wissam and Ellen (2014) defines this as an
account records the payments and receipts of transactions of the citizens of
that particular country with residents living in another country. Ones the
payments and receipts of each country will include equally only if the
operations are also included, neutrality will only favor one state at the
expense of the other by allowing it acquire more assets from the not so
preferred country. (Xiaoying & Xiaming 2005,
pp. 393-407). An evident example is if
Americans purchase automobiles from the Japanese, and don’t engage further in
other transactions chances are the Japan will end up holding dollars either in
the form of bank deposits or engage in other investments in the US. These
payments are then balanced depending on the transactions made for the
acquisition of the dollar assets (Jean et al.
2005, pp. 1-43).
However much the balancing is done deficits must occur as a result of inequalities and excess payments, therefore leading to a surplus in particular forms of transactions including the service trade merchandise trade (James & Mark 2000). The balance of payments in any country must refer to some class of operations.
Various definitions have been given to the balance of payments surplus and deficits in the past. Every definition had its distinct implications and purposes. It is until 1973 that there was a focus on the definition of balance-of-payments which had the intentions of measuring the ability of a country to meets its responsibilities of exchanging its currency for other currencies or for tagging it to the Gold system at a fixed rate exchange like the Great Britain did (Maurice 2010, pp. 1–23).
So as to meet
the newly formed obligations countries strived to maintain a stock of official
reserves, in the form of foreign country currencies or gold that they would use
to in supporting their local currencies. The decline in this stores stock was
seen as crucial balance-of-payment deficit since it threatened a country’s
ability to meet its responsibilities (Arthur
2003, pp. 979-992).
This type of
debt was not a good indicator at all when looking at the financial position of
a state. The reason being that it never looked at the likelihood that the state
would be called upon to meet its delegated duties and the willingness of the
international monetary institution to provide assistance (James & Mark 2000).
Caroline (2004, pp. 20-29), points that after 1973, official reserves unit of measuring a country’s ability to meet its obligations diminished as various economic giants gave up their responsibility of converting their currency at a fixed exchange. The made reserves look more meaningless, and there was no longer any concern about the changes in a country’s reserves (Ngaire 2000, pp. 82-841).
Xiaoying and Xiaming (2005, pp. 393-407), purports that after the 1973 talks on the balance of payment surplus or deficits now refer to current accounts. This account has a trade in goods, investment incomes earned abroad and the unilateral transfers. It doesn’t include the capital account, which includes the sales of securities or property. Since the current account and the capital account sum up to the total account, which is necessarily balanced, debt in the current account always comes with an equal surplus in the capital account and vice versa (Maurice 2010, pp. 1–23). Deficit or surplus present in the current account cannot be evaluated without different explanations and the evaluation of an equal surplus or deficit in the capital account.
A State is
considered to be in deficit when in its current account is higher its price
level. When the Gross National Product is greater the interests rates are also
higher and the lesser the barriers towards imports and more attractive it’s to
international investors, compared to other countries (Barry 1999).
Kenneth (1996, pp. 647-668), argues that the impacts of any change in one of these factors on the country’s current account balance cannot be predicted without looking at the effects of the other international financial management factors. For instance, if the government increases tariffs, citizens are likely to import fewer goods, therefore, decreasing the current account deficit. In this case, where this decline will occur only when one of other factors changes to bring about a reduction in the capital account surplus.
According to Axel and James (2015, pp.120-148), if none of these factors changes then the decrease in imports due to an increase in tariffs will lead to a decline in the demand for the country’s foreign currency, this, in turn, will raise the local value of the respective country. The increase in the value of any countries increase makes that individual country exports more expensive and imports cheaper, therefore offsetting the implications of the growth in Tariffs. The overall result is that the increase in tariff will bring no change to the current account (Caroline 2004, pp. 20-29)
Contrary to the
thoughts of most people, the existence of a deficit in the present account in
itself is not a signal towards a recessing economy or irrational economic
policies. If a country has a deficit in its current account, it can sometimes
mean that the country is importing capital. Importing capital is no more a
peculiar system it is just like importing coffee or tea.
Arthur, C 2003. “The euro: faith, hope and
parity, International Affairs.” pp. 979-992.
Axel, D 2009. “IMF conditionality: theory and
evidence, Public Choice.” pp. 233-267.
Axel, D, Jan, E, S & James Vreeland 2015. “Politics
and IMF Conditionality”. Journal of
Conflict Resolution. Vol. 59, Vol. 1, pp.120-148.
Barry, E 1999. “Kicking the Habit: moving from
pegged exchange rates to greater exchange rate flexibility”. The Economic Journal C1 – C14 Equator
Caroline, M 2004. “Managing Exchange Rates:
Achievement of Global Rebalancing or evidence of global co-dependency.” Business Economics, pp. 20-29.
Chiara, F, Francesco, R & Giuseppe, M 2010.
“Why do Firms Invest Abroad? An Analysis of the Motives Underlying Foreign
Direct Investments.” The IUP Journal of
International Business Law. Vol. 9, No. 1 & 2, pp. 42-65
B, Melika, B, S & Marine C 2010. “Detecting Mean Reversion in Real Exchange
Rates from a Multiple Regime STAR model.” Annals
of Economics and Statistics, pp. 395-427.
James, R, L & Mark, P, T 2000. “Purchasing
power parity over two centuries: strengthening the case for real exchange rate
stability A reply to Cuddington and Liang.” Journal
of International Money and Finance. Vol. 19, No.1, pp. 759–764.
Jean, I, Haroon, M, Morten R & Helene Rey
2005. “PPP Strikes Back: Aggregation and the Real Exchange Rate.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics.
Vol.34, No 1, pp. 1-43.
John, H, D 2000. “The eclectic paradigm as an
envelope for economic and business theories of MNE activity”. International Business Review 9, pp. 163–190.
Kenneth, R 1996. “International Financial Management The Purchasing Power Parity Puzzle.” Journal of Economic Literature. Vol. 45, pp. 647-668.
Maurice, O 2010. “Does the Current Account
Still Matter?” American Economic Review.
Vol.102, No. 3, pp. 1–23.
W 2000. “The Challenge of Good Governance for the IMF and the World Bank
Themselves.” World Development. Vol.
28, No. 5, pp. 82-841.
Shaun, F & Andrew L 2004. “International Financial Management, new financial system? Towards a conceptualization of financial reintermediation.” Review of International Political Economy. Vol. 11, No.2, pp. 263-288.
Susan, F & Anil G 2009. “Subsidiaries and Country Risk: internalization as a safeguard against weak external institutions.” Academy of International Financial Management, Vol. 52, No. 2, pp. 381–399.
Wissam, H & Ellen, M 2014. “Hong Kong’s
Currency Crisis: A Test of the 1990s.” Washington
Consensus’ View, International Finance. Vol. 17, No.3, pp. 273–296.
Xiaoying, L & Xiaming, L .2005. “Foreign Direct Investment, International Financial Management and Economic Growth.” An Increasingly Endogenous Relationship World Development. Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 393-407.
Behavioral Finance and
the Psychology of Financial Decision
Behavioral finance and financial decisions have a big role in shaping critical decisions that people make. The study summarizes the facts about financial choices and the behavioral and psychological theories influencing them. We learn that people have predisposed cognitive constraints coupled with low levels of financial literacy, in such regard, their decision-making choices violate sound financial principles. The case studies teach us that most investors and managers over-extrapolate from past returns and trade, or they make decisions based on overconfidence and personal history.
We explain most of these behaviors based on behavioral finance theories like prospect theory, behavioral finance, and behavioral corporate finance. Many companies and institutions today shy away from traditionally defined benefit pension plans in favor of defined contribution plans, in such circumstance, the role of the financial adviser is gaining an integral value.
In this case study, a recent graduate from UMUC is employed to advise different clients on investment. The consultant delves into studying the biases in financial behavior that predict prospective theory. While applying the key concepts of behavioral finance, the consultant can recognize that the client (Violet) displays behavioral biases that impede optimal savings and consumption allocation. He can learn this by deducing from concepts of finance that assess how people organize their financial assets by creating separate slots for money designated for specific roles as well as other approaches such as mental accounting.
Expected Utility and Prospect Theory:
Unlike most of the economic
theories, Expected utility theory is the most preferred by scholars ((Shiller, Robert J.). The approach attracts people
because it has the best economical representation characterizing true rational
behavior in uncertain situations. However, application of expected theory is
criticized in many circumstances because of the systematical misrepresentation
of human behavior.
proved that Prospect Theory refers to a mathematically developed theory
that substitutes “value function” contrasted to “utility function” and
“weights” contrasted to “probabilities” in expected utility theory. Here,
people work to increase the weighted total value instead of utility such that
probabilities do not equal weight. Simply put, people view extremely probable as
certain but the improbable events as impossible.
In many circumstances, prospect
theory appears inconsistent with expected utility theory. To begin with, in
probabilities, utility is all linear but not value. Also, value is defined
regarding losses and profits, but utility depends on final wealth.
Contrary to expected utility
theory, prospect theory foretells that preferences depend on how a problem is
approached. In case the reference point defines the outcome as an advantage, in
this case, the resulting value function will be curved in, and those making
decision will be risk-averse. But if the
reference point’s outcome is seen as a loss, those making decisions will be
risk seeking since is a convex value function.
Violations of Expected Utility
The possible abuses of this theory
include the Allais paradox (certainty effect), and inflation of small
probabilities. As for Allais paradox, there is an extreme underweighting of
high probabilities. In such a case, it falls short of certainties such that the
travel time outcomes become extremely attractive. On the other hand, inflation
of small probabilities violation projects itself in the form of a set of
stated-preference route-choice challenges.
The definition of the value function lies on variations from a reference point,
and in most circumstances, it is risk aversion–concave for gains, convex for
losses. Similarly, value function is acute for losses than for profits. In this
case, the stress of decisions is less compared with the equivalent
probabilities, with few exceptions in the assortment of low probabilities. A value strategy deals with the
purchase of stocks that have low prices compared with the dividends, earnings,
book assets, or similar measures of significant value.
The Implications of Prospect Theory for the Efficient Market Hypothesis
An efficient market, based on the definition
by (Fama 1965), is characterized by a large pool of rational profit maximizers
who compete against each other to interpret the market prices of individual
securities in the years to come; out of which a large pool of the present
information is easily available to all participants. The prevailing competition
in such a market opens the effects of new information on the actual prices in
an instantaneous way. In such a way, the prospect theory sets in under the
circumstance that makes stock price unpredictable following a random pathway.
Provided that information flow is
unrestricted and quickly reflects in the stock price, the probability for the
future price to change will depend not on today’s price changes, but on
tomorrow’s news. Given that news is unpredictable, consequently, price changes
also turnout unpredictable, and this conforms to the principle of prospect
theory whereby people view extremely probable as certain but the improbable
events as impossible.
Market Hypothesis is characterized by the security prices that reflect
available information. It is based on the traditional view that investors use
rationale in executing the present information to increase the expected
Anomalies of Efficient Market Hypothesis’ set in when people feel there is
something wrong with the concept of Efficient Market Hypothesis. Under such
conditions, the rational approaches of investors lacks consistence. It is not wholly
right and must be analyzed alongside other human behavior approaches like the
prospect theory, overconfidence, or expected utility, or over and under
reaction, as well as the limits to arbitrage. Examples of anomalies as
expressed by prospect theory include the size, valuation, and the momentum
The Valuation Effect. Studies reveal that firms with higher P/B multiples are outperformed by those with low price/book (P/B) multiples.
The Size Effect. Studies predict that firms with smaller market capitalizations outperform those with large market capitalizations, disregard of the controls in their higher risk.
The Momentum Effect. Studies reveal that firms with good performance for the past six months to one year period outperform those that performed poorly over the same period.
Bias identification and how such behavioral finance concepts affect their investment decisions
The First Colleague: The Concept of Illusion of Control
The stated bias happens when people overly
justify their ideas. It describes people’s propensity to believe that they can
exert influence on the outcomes of action when, in the real sense, they cannot.
When this kind of bias occurs, people behave as if they can fully control their
situations than they actually can ((Ising, Alexander).
The first colleague responds by claiming to
know the technology industry and is determined to invest in them. While he
might have worked in the industry for a while, it is not justifiable to assume
that the circumstances will prevail in the long run. He is preoccupied with the
illusion of control bias.
However, the illusion of control bias can be
financially damaging since entrepreneurs might be motivated to trade more than
what is right. It may lead them to employ limit orders, maintain
under-diversified portfolios, or other related means just to express a false
sense of influence over their trade portfolios.
People who practice this bias find it hard
acceding with the irrationality and the changing nature of markets and the fact
that their expectation is a failed one. The outcome is a spiral of investment
catastrophe with the rationalization that while their belief is right, the one
who drove the buttons was so incompetent.
In the long run, the investor becomes
overconfident. The consequences of long-term investment may not be affected by
the immediate-term opinion, emotions, and impulses that frequently engulf
financial transactions. Rather, the success or lack of it emanates from
uncontrollable factors such as the prevailing economic conditions and corporate
The Second Colleague: Confirmation Bias
to the second colleague, the value of commercial property in the city has
maintained a 14% increase since the year 2000 reported a famous newspaper
article. Now, this is almost two decades down the line. It is very unbelievable
to assert that the value of the property has remained consistent over such a
lengthy period, and very few investors would settle on that. However, depending
on the interest of the reader and the prevailing circumstance, we can only
assume that the type of newspaper is biased towards such reports and that the
investor too is biased and love reading similar reports.
to confirmation bias, individuals are drawn to
information that substantiates their existing perceptions. It is just similar
when a person prefers watching news from a TV channel that represents his/her
political views while evading those that feature commentators of divergent
opinions. Similarly, people behave in the like manner concerning their
financial issues. Entrepreneurs believe in the market conditions will make them
walk toward information sources that validate such a belief.
While it is acceptable to attach an emphasis
to the consequences of our aspirations, for example, investing heavily in the
stock of the firm you’re working for, it poses significant risks when it comes
to diversification. If you should overcome confirmation bias, stress must be
levied on obtaining information from various.
The Third Colleague: Depicting Recency Bias
bias is a cognitive intrusion that encourages to perceive the most recent
information as more relevant compared to the old knowledge. However, this may
not be necessarily true. People base their investment decisions on how the market
has been recently performing. The exact state is seen on the third respondent
whose investment decisions in the Omega Corporation are drawn from the current
state of the company and industry. She denotes that from the decline of the
industry to capitalize on her investments since she presumes that case to
remain constant for some time.
Most entrepreneurs have the inclination to follow investment performance by investing more in the industry when it is peaking and just about to reverse. Given that the investment has been picking up recently, investors anticipate that to remain the case. However, based on the behavioral theory, it would be wrong for her to rely on this approach to make financial decisions. In most circumstances, people do extrapolate from recent performance and employ them as a signal of future performance which is very wrong. Consequently, entrepreneurs fall into the ploy of over-purchasing the now outperforming asset and under-own the now drifting asset.
Behavioral Finance and Investments
Siosan’s utility function. Contrasted with that assumed in traditional finance theory
Traditional finance posits that
humans are risk-averse, they love greater certainty than limited certainty and
have a perfect utility function. Conversely, behavioral theorists assume that
people display multiple characteristics and while they may be risk-averse, they
may also be risk-seeking, risk-neutral, or any blend of the three. Depending on
how things present themselves influences decision making.
The utility function measures an
individual’s preferences over a set of products, measured in units referred to
as utils. Utils exemplify the level of satisfaction of a consumer from choosing
a specific type or number of products. Traditional finance is built on the
utility theory with an assumption of diminishing marginal return. On the other
hand, Behavioral theorists assume that human beings don’t always
act in their best financial interests.
Appropriate in this
case study, the utility function specifies the satisfaction of an investor out
of all possible combinations.
For example, an investment with low risk and high return has a bigger utility
than that with high risk and low gain. This kind of function represents both
their welfare along with their preferences. Violet expresses utility function
that follows the behavioral approach. She wants to spend more. However, she’s
quite unaware of the circumstances of tomorrow reflected in her limited
investments. Under a traditional approach, Violet would either invest or not
invest at all. It would be that she has knowledge of the future market or she
does not, and if she lacks, her utility function would be concave. She would
spend less just to avoid the risks in the future.
Similarly, she purchases expensive
goods like cars and takes vacations for her satisfaction although, she feels
reluctant to incur debts. This is opposed to traditional finance that assumes a
diminishing marginal utility; Violet proposes utility function that will always
satisfy her interests and won’t diminish. Violet expresses some mix of
traditional and behavioral approach in some part, and traditional finance is
reflected in the way she detests debts. Albeit, she does little to avert those
debts, thus in part demonstrating a behavioral approach.
Siosian’s Behavioral Biases and how a rational economic individual in traditional finance would behave differently concerning each bias
Various cognitive predispositions cause
several behavioral biases or under-saving inclinations. This is according to
the perception by behavioral scientists who present several biases that emanate
from such predispositions by grouping them into three categories. Such include
preference biases, perceptions of prospects, perceptions on how to make
decisions bearing in mind the rest of variables, and price perceptions. The
typical behavioral bias presented in this case is the preference bias, and it
manifests itself in the form of the self-control, loss aversion, and
Costly self-control bias- Living for today
that many people struggle with self-control in various fields. It may present
itself through over-eating, under-saving, or over-snoozing, what we can call as
“living for today”. Approaches to costly self-control
also suggest that such people will value commitment such that they will choose,
and even pay, to limit their future decision in some way, in an attempt to
discourage their future over-consumption predilections.
in this case, study, Violet fits this model of costly self-control bias. We
find that she engages in costly endeavors like buying expensive cars and paying
for expensive meals in upscale vacation resorts. She does this at the expense
of investing. In fact, she would do all the best she can to live a luxurious
life while doing little on her mortgage and other investments. Her approach is
behavioral and contrary to how traditional theorists would behave since they
would fear the risks of tomorrow and would spend less on consumption and be
concerned about the future.
The bias is comparative to some reference
point like current consumption, or friends’ consumption. Loss aversion may also
be seen as a potential threat to consumers leveraging their savings rates.
People fear more to invest in their view of avoiding losses (Thaler, Richard, and Shlomo 164-187).
Loss aversion occurs when people easily
notice the reduction in investment portfolio more than how they view gains, and
this may be even when the profits are greater. They frequently get upset when
they lose money during the market recession such that they remember those
losses forever, but they would hardly remember the time they made 40-percent
increase, just the time they lost 30-percent. We can state that Violet has an
outspoken loss aversion bias when she says she detests making losses. Given
that she has very little investment but high expenditure, this might be the
reason why she rarely invests. Her approach reflects a traditional finance
theory that assumes people are risk-averse.
Siosian’s Retirement Portfolio and Justification
Violet’s retirement portfolio is such that
she maintains a minimal retirement plan where she deposits half the sum of
money coming from her annual bonuses and none-salary incomes. On the other, we
notice that she runs a very small mortgage and limited investments that can
sustain her. Basing on such decisions, her retirement portfolio is so
The Social Security Administration posits
that on average, a 65-year pensioner can expect to stay for the next 18–20½
years after quitting the job (Benz par 3).
Nonetheless, health advancements now make people stay for more years, and it
would be advisable that you schedule a retirement portfolio of 30 or more
years, and in such a case, the retirement saving plan becomes so essential.
Rather than just depositing money in the portfolio, it should be used in
investment opportunities to generate more wealth for old age. The objective is remaining invested—and
that implies having some part of the money assigned to stocks, but in the right
standing with other investments.
The objective of investing retirement
portfolio is to generate a mix of investments that merge to preserve capital,
create income, and expand. Such a combination of stock, bond and cash investments
must be in line with age, income, financial needs, time, and risk. For this
reason, we can say Violet’s retirement portfolio is very weak and inappropriate (Williams par 6).
Behavioral Corporate Finance
RE: Recent Behavioral Finance Literature dealing with the Board of Directors.
We can study behavioral finance
featuring the panel of executives under the concept of corporate governance ((Shivdasani, Anil, and
Marc Zenner). Management of financial institutions has taken a different
approach given the attrition of the significance of corporate governance in
guiding financial decisions. Albeit, this is very recent studied by
contemporary economists who assert the role of the board of governors in
guiding the company’s value creation and improved financial performance
particularly during this onset of consistent corporate flaws. Many companies
have since collapsed, examples of Lehman Brothers, Rank Xerox, and Enron just
to name a few, all blamed the faulty board of governors (Shivdasani, Anil, and David Yermack).
We have several lessons to learn
from this shrinking–specifically–there is one lesson that stands out clear–the
role of corporate governance in determining its capacity to contest positively
particularly in stormy environmental conditions where others strive hard to
Contemporary literature on
behavioral finance vis-à-vis corporate governance emanates from Adolph, Berle and Means (23) study where they assert
that, in reality, managers of companies sought their interest at the expense of
the shareholders’ interests. Their
investigation stressed the need for an effective plan to help aid in mitigating
the conflict of interests between company owners and managers. Therefore, while
the concept of corporate governance might appear new, it addresses typical
concerns present since time long (Ayuso, Silvia, and Argandoña 2-19).
Many countries, corporations, and
agencies across the globe have started to respond to the corporate flaws by
initiating a series of legislation and guidelines that guide decisions of the
board of governors in financial implications. Such rules are referred to as the
codes of best practices. These legislations guide the behavior and structure of
the board of directors while doing their monitory and supervisory duties (Shivdasani, Anil, and David Yermack).
Such codes, though, issued in
different regions, they have similar peculiarities regarding corporate culture
and general corporate environment, and alignment of the interest of parties
(Shareholders and Management). Corporate governance codification of governance
aims at mitigating the corresponding deficiencies in or lack of appropriate
shareholders shields (Shivdasani, Anil, and David
Your Future and Behavioral Finance Post 2008
Behavioral Finance Lessons during
and after the Great Recession
Several themes emerge drawing from
the issues aired by Stephanie pertaining behavioral finance during and after
the great recession. While the economic downturn attracted several consequences
on the corporate world, I believe the corporate directors and other
stakeholders had the mandate to prevent its occurrence, and correspondingly,
they can stop the reoccurrence of the same by studying behavioral finance
theories. The recession affected the entire globe since businesses collapsed,
and many people lost jobs and houses. However, I believe that if financial
behaviorist can avoid a repeat of the 2008 great recession, they should derive
from behavioral finance theories, Shefrin and Staman reports this in their
book, ‘Behavioral Finance in the Financial
Several factors drew the crisis, and such factors persist that
perpetuate the current crisis. They include; a weak government regulation,
investment banks that exceedingly leverage debts, and strained homeowners’
finances. We can explain the consequences of 2008 crisis from a financial
theory basis. While traditional economics base their assumptions of
rationality, they assert that people make rational economic choices as they try
to maximize their earnings. On the contrary, behavioral economists assume that
people make their financial selections based on their emotions psychological
conditions, as well as on cognitive errors.
The 2008 crisis is
best explained by the principles of behavioral economics. Here, we find a
correlation of the crisis with the overly optimistic lending behaviors of
people since such is connected to the stock market fluctuations even as
witnessed currently. Psychologists have effectively documented the propensity of
people to perceive the through
rose-tinted lenses, often referred to as the optimism bias.
Much of the 2008
crisis revolved around financial psychology. We can study psychology as part of
the behavioral finance theory. In essence, it incorporates aspects like
overconfidence, perception and cognition, aspirations, emotions, and culture (Morgenson, Gretchen and Joshua Rosner).
economists had warned of the inhibiting economic crisis. While banks,
businesses, and many corporations received such warnings, many were
overconfident in their investments. Overconfidence Before the great 2008
recession, economists warned that the economy was going under. Entrepreneurs
were such overconfident such that they hardly analyzed the risk of holding such
huge portfolios in mortgage-backed securities, provided the threat of being in
a bubble. Most of the homeowners took out loans just to satisfy the American
dream — they purchased during a bubble overconfident that housing prices would
skyrocket and remain persistent.
However, an increase in the housing
market, and the stock market, only works to raise people’s overconfidence since
they would ascribe the gains or losses they achieve as a result of their
proficiency in finance, although, it results from market moods.
Recency bias was one
implication that cultivated the crisis. That’s because entrepreneurs make
choices based on the most recent information. Decisions may be constructed on
the very latest feedback. Although, such information may not be primarily
relevant. During the time, investors overreacted because of the congress’s
finance rescue project.
emotions such as anger, fear, and sadness influence the type of decisions made,
including economic choices. More fearful people become risk-averse, but more
angry people become more enthusiastic to incur risks, even financial risks. As
for the economic downturn, people had others in mind to accuse of the financial
crisis. Take the example of Wall Street banks that became so angry such that
they easily took the financial risk to punish the offenders.
economists assume that the kind of financial errors made aren’t haphazard, and
the choice made too aren’t fundamentally rational. Rather, they are built on
psychological conditions such as cognitive errors and biases.
In our attempts to
evade the similar crisis in our market, we can learn a lot from the economic
downturn of 20008 and the related occurrences of the past. For instance, the
1974-75 economic recession almost resembled the 2007-2009 crisis. On the same
note, the twin Reagan-era recessions of the 1980s had profound consequences
such as joblessness and a subsequent S&L and sovereign debt crunch. The
1990s foreign currency crisis mandated an immediate discarding of the Long-Term
Capital Management without interfering with the worldwide economic system. Just
like Lipsky reports, the 2008 housing bubble was a consequence of a simmering
wrongly predisposes us to imagine we can see and analyze the future crises
pretty well the way we do the previous and establish strategies that would
impede future crises. However, we are limited to devise policies that can avert
future crises should we even be able to identify them since those who would
lose are in our paths standing against us. No doubt restraining bank leverage
would do some good; nonetheless, bankers have the smack to strangle it. Consequently,
we have a few decision left–our psychological fallibilities. Assessing our
psychological biases will work a great deal in averting and mitigating some
discussion above, behavioral finance case studies focus on determining the
clear-cut direction to which various market forces—such as rational analysis of
organization-specific and macroeconomic basics; cultural, human and social psychology
trends—affect investors and managers expectations and define their level of
Adolph, Berle, and Gardiner Means. The
Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York, NY, Macmillan, 1932.
Allais, M. “Le Comportement De L’homme Rationnel Devant Le Risque: Critique Des Postulats Et Axiomes De L’ecole Americaine.” Econometrica, vol 21, no. 4, 1953, p. 503. JSTOR.
Ayuso, Silvia, and Antonio Argandoña. “Responsible Corporate Governance: Towards A Stakeholder Board of Directors?” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2009, p.2-19. Elsevier BV.
Benz, C. “The Bucket Investor’s Guide to Setting Asset Allocation for Retirement.” News.Morningstar.Com, 2016, par 3.
Ising, Alexander. “Pompian, M. (2006): Behavioral Finance And Wealth Management – How To Build Optimal Portfolios That Account For Investor Biases.” Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, vol 21, no. 4, 2007, pp. 491-492. Springer Nature.
Lipsky, J. Overcoming the Great
Recession An Address to the Japan National Press Club, Remarks by John Lipsky,
First Deputy Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund, at the Japan
National Press Club, Tokyo, May 18, 2009. Tokyo: Japan National Press Club,
Morgenson, Gretchen, and Joshua Rosner. Reckless
Endangerment: How Outsized Ambition, Greed, And Corruption Led To Economic
Armageddon. New York, New York, St. Martin’s Griffin, 2012.
Shefrin Hersh, &Meir Statman. Behavioral
Finance in the Financial Crisis: Market Efficiency, Minsky, and Keynes.
Santa Clara: Santa Clara University, 2011.
Shiller, Robert J. “Bubbles, Human Judgment, and Expert Opinion.” Financial Analysts Journal, vol 58, no. 3, 2002, pp. 18-26. CFA Institute.
Shivdasani, Anil, and David Yermack. “CEO Involvement in the Selection Of New Board Members: An Empirical Analysis.” The Journal of Finance, vol 54, no. 5, 1999, pp. 1829-1853. Wiley-Blackwell.
Shivdasani, Anil, and Marc Zenner. “Best Practices In Corporate Governance: What Two Decades Of Research Reveals.” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, vol 16, no. 2-3, 2004, pp. 29-41. Wiley-Blackwell.
Thaler, Richard H., and Shlomo Benartzi. “Save More Tomorrow™: Using Behavioral Economics To Increase Employee Saving.” Journal of Political Economy, vol 112, no. S1, 2004, pp. S164-S187. University Of Chicago Press.
Williams, Rob. “Plan, Allocate and Distribute: Structuring Your Retirement Portfolio for Your Income Needs.” Par 6. Schwab Brokerage, 2017.
If you enjoyed reading this post on behavioral finance, I would be very grateful if you could help spread this knowledge by emailing this post to a friend, or sharing it on Twitter or Facebook. Thank you.